science vs religion both word are same and one, then who is dividing this word and why

science and religion 

both word are same and one, 

then who is dividing this word and why 

shaitan is beautifully created a division between good vs good, so it is strategic and tactics of shaitan to deceive human kind and jinkind, 

so how to save ourselves from this deceiviing nature of shaitan, 

like example, 

moses vs mohammad

both are prophet of universe from Allaah, both are good and great, 

like example 

jesus vs mohammad

both are prophet of universe from Allaah, 

both are good and great 

so in same way, need to understand the knowledge of reveleation that is quran and sahi hadith

science and religion
science mean reason, 
the prophet Muhammad (saas) said first thing Allaah created on earth is reason. 
reason mean science
 science is created by Allaah
and the person who follow science is known as religion. 
so religion mean a person who follow science
right now to understand the concept of word, there are two type of understanding going on in world. 
one is understanding of kuffar and munafequn, and other understanding is of muslim. 
kuffar and munafequn understand the word in different way, and their understanding is wide spread in masses through media, because media is controlled by kuffar+munafequn. 
muslim understanding is of quran and sahi hadith. 

	Kuffar and munafequn understanding	Muslim understanding
	Religion is bondage	Religion is independent
	Religion is cult	Religion is open
	Religion is slavery	Religion is freedom
	Religion is sun by priest and richer community	Religion is run by law
	Law is bend to obey richer community	Law is uphold at any cost
	Richer community enjoy music and sex	Music and sex is punishable
	Priest obey to richer community	Law is uphold at any cost
	Whatever priest and richer community dictate is law	Quran and sahi hadith is law
	Every action is preferred to priest (fatwa)	Every action is preferred to quran and sahi hadith
	Religion is to obey priest (pure slavery)	Religion is to obey law (pure independence)
	Every member is considered business unit, so finance is provided with interest	Every member is considered brother and sister, finance provided without interest
	Religion is practised with will of priest and richer community	Religion is practised with science Science mean reason
	So whatever kuffar and munafequn are describing about religion is correct because of their sufferering at the hand of priest and richer community	But in muslim the scenario is opposite, here everybody enjoy religion, because it give independence.

http://sciencevsreligion.org/
 http://sciencevsreligion.net/


========================================================================

Come, let us reason together...
Reason and Faith      by Frederic Henry Hedge      (from Reason in Religion, 1865)      Faith is determined by accidental causes; it has no necessary relation to truth.       A strong persuasion, but no objective certitude.  It embraces error as well as      truth, and embraces it with equal affection.   But reason, in its proper nature, is      identical with the actual truth of things, that is, their relation in the mind of God;      and human reason, on any intelligible theory of God's government, must be a      continual approximation to absolute truth....      Reason requires the nutriment and impulse furnished by faith.  Faith Requires      the discreet elaboration of reason.  The one has substance; the other, the form.       Reason alone would give us a world without God, bodies without spirits, earth      without heaven, a day without a morrow, a way without a goal.  Faith alone would      give us a pantheon of questionable divinites, a pandemonium of unqestionable fiends,      an overshadowing theocracy for civil rule, a dispensation of dark ages without end.       (But some of us don't really believe this.  Actually what we do believe is that faith       suffocates science, eventually.  Ed.) ----------------      Scientists say:   "Extraordinary claims require extraodinary proof."      Theologians say:  That is a double standard since Scientists often do not apply it to their             discoveries.   General relativity for instance was proven on the basis of subtle effects             involving the orbit of the planet Mercury, etc., and slight displacement of starlight             when viewed near the sun, evidence hardly qualiying as extraordinary.         With respect to Christianity scientists need to explain how Christianity arose, which              if it was not due to extraodinary events, must have occurred in some other way. --------------------       "It is so much easier to believe than to think; it is astounding how much more believing is done than thinking!"                                                                                                      James F. Kemper, civil engineer                                                                                                      from Rising Tide by John M. Barry -------------------           "It is through knowledge of the creation that we arrive at knowledge of the Creator."                                                    William of Conches, 1143 AD Or...     "Since God has spoken to us it is no longer necessary to think."                                                    Attributed to Tertullian, 203 AD     --------------- Both Science and Religion are concerned with finding out about the truth of our situation.  Who are we?  Why are we here?  What is our purpose?  But they can come up with somewhat different answers.          Science                     versus                  Religion  Gather Empirical Facts      <-???->    Study an Ancient and Revered Book      (the "evidence")                                 (believed to be God's word)                 |                                                             |                           \/                                                            \/  Use Critical Reasoning       <-???->         Accept it by Faith (based on the evidence)                  (based on instinct, a feeling, intuition?)                           |                                                             |                 \/                                                            \/  Form A Tentative Theory   <-???->          Revealed Truth (Either the reasoning or                        (must not be doubted?) the facts may be wrong, so best if submitted to a jury of one's peers for their agreement.) Which is the best path to truth?  Science or faith, or some mix of both?  You be the judge.  The truth of science may not be what you want it to be.  It may be an unpleasant truth (eg possibly there is no after-life, no immortal soul), and it will have been hard work to get there (ironically sometimes referred to as "soul-searching"), whereas faith usually appears out of an emotional acceptance, that "Yes, it must be true!" (I can't bear to think about the alternative).   last site update: 10/2/09; this page 10/2/09; operating since 09 October 2005. Please send comment/suggestions to john@sciencevsreligion.org.
Home Page | About Us | Genesis | Miracles | The Gospels Copyright © 2009 Copyright © 2005 Copyright. All Rights Reserved.. All Rights Reserved.

======================================================================

                                                                         Welcome to

Science vs. Religion

As a physician, the scientist in me had trouble believing in the existence of God.  I was an agnostic. 

How do  you know God exists?  Are you on the fence?  Or, are you an atheist?  I needed answers. 

 I didn't want to continue sitting on the fence. This book is an accumulation of my studies over the years to see if I could prove the existence of God.  The scientist side of me insisted upon discovering if there were logical reasons for belief.  In the book, you will learn that I have found multiple scientific findings that lead logically to accepting God. 

 Science Vs. Religion shows that I have discovered that the scientific findings of the past 150 years prove God beyond a reasonable doubt. Our universe is carefully designed to allow life and human development. The universe started with a "Big Bang," the beginning of time and space. Science has shown there is no 'before' before the Bang, and science does not know what caused it. Darwin's Theory of Evolution appears to do away with God, but there is enormous controversy among Darwin scientists as to how evolution works. Many other scientists also raise critical objections to the Theory. Darwinism is not proven!! 

Scientists don't know how life got started, despite 50 years of laboratory research, because living matter, even single-celled forms, has been found to be extremely complex. Our entire society is divided over the Theory of Evolution. This controversy has entered our schools, religious teachings and politics. Unless you haven't noticed, faith in God is currently under attack in this country by secular scientists and secularists.  This book answers them.

The book proposes, for those who have faith in God and for those who have chosen not to accept God on faith, if they look at modern scientific discoveries, they will find overwhelming evidence of the Hand of God. If you already accept God, the scientific review in this book will only act to strengthen that faith. 

My book surveys over 100 other books.  Those references provide plenty of material for you to do your own searching in every direction possible, or to provide your children with answers to the partial truths they receive in school. 

  Make up your own mind about faith in God. Whatever suits you is fine with me. After 20 years  of study, I am very satisfied with what I believe and finally, I believe in God and have faith in God. 

 Email Me     Reviews        Comments from readers   Synopses of Chapters    My Background                                   

Science and Religion Links    Order         Government by Political Spin         News Articles and Events

Web site at publisher, PublishAmerica: http://www.publishedauthors.net/davidturell/index.html

My article on how to properly teach the Darwin Theory in Public Education  

=====================================================================